New York Times Co. v Sullivan short film, reactions DOCUMENTARY Fest (interview)
5m 28s
New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 10min,. Canada
Directed by Yanjia Yang
In the heat of the Civil Rights Movement, a full-page ad in The New York Times sparked a legal battle that would redefine freedom of the press in America. Through archival footage, this short film explores how the case reinforced First Amendment protections and shaped journalism as we know it today. A must-watch for anyone interested in media, law, and the enduring power of free speech.
Get to know the filmmaker:
1. What motivated you to make this film?
I was driven by a desire to revisit the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case not just as a historical legal milestone, but as a powerful reminder of how fragile our freedoms truly are. In an era where misinformation, polarization, and censorship continue to challenge democratic ideals, I felt a strong responsibility to explore the balance between rights and responsibilities. I wanted my generation to understand that free speech is not abstract; it is something we must actively reflect upon.
2. From the idea to the finished product, how long did it take for you to make this film?
This was my very first documentary, and as an 11th-grade student, it was a steep learning curve. From research to editing, the process took about three months. There were moments of doubt, technical setbacks, and challenges in simplifying complex legal ideas. Though it required a lot of effort and time commitment, I pushed through and was able to find the true meaning of creating this film.
3. How would you describe your film in two words!?
Conviction. Awareness.
4. What was the biggest obstacle you faced in completing this film?
The hardest part was staying focused on the "why" while navigating the overwhelming "how." Legal cases are not always emotionally engaging, especially for a student audience, but I needed to find a way to make the case feel urgent. Balancing that emotional weight with historical and legal accuracy was my biggest challenge.
5. What were your initial reactions when watching the audience talking about your film in the feedback video?
It was humbling. Hearing others respond thoughtfully to a film I poured so much effort into reminded me that storytelling can create ripples. It made me realize that even as a student, I can start conversations that matter.
6. When did you realize that you wanted to make films?
Working on this project showed me how film can become a form of activism, a voice for issues that deserve attention. I don't just want to tell stories. I want to shape dialogue, inspire curiosity, and advocate for the overlooked. That realization changed how I see my future.
7. What film have you seen the most in your life?
Probably The Post. It's a film that reminds me how courage and journalism can intersect in transformative ways, especially when truth is at risk.
8. What other elements of the festival experience can we and other festivals implement to satisfy you and help you further your filmmaking career?
I think festivals that showcase youth work should also create space for dialogue; panel discussions, mentorships, or even virtual filmmaker circles. Hearing from others, especially more experienced filmmakers, would help young voices like mine grow stronger and more informed.
9. You submitted to the festival via FilmFreeway. How has your experience been working on the festival platform site?
It's been very smooth and accessible. As a student, I found the platform intuitive and empowering, it made something that felt "out of reach" become possible.
10. What is your favorite meal?
A warm bowl of chicken noodle soup: simple, comforting, and always reminds me of home.
11. What is next for you? A new film?
Yes. I want to continue exploring intersections between justice, identity, and memory. I'm working on a short piece that reflects on generational silence and the stories we inherit, as well as researching a larger project on education equity. I believe film can be a tool not just for seeing the world, but for changing it.